The term “4 P’s of Marketing” as part of the ‘marketing mix’ was first coined in the early 1950s. The concept is that marketers must recognize and utilize four interwoven components when determining a product or brand’s offering — Product, Price, Place and Promotion.
For many years this concept has been the foundation for most sales and marketing plans. Recently, I’ve seen suggestions of adding more P’s such as People and Process to the mix. I’ve also seen new concepts introducing 4 C’s as a more customer-driven replacement — Consumer, Cost, Communication and Convenience. I would argue that in today’s B2B environment, a new approach is required.
In the most recent issue of Harvard Business Review, I came across an interesting viewpoint on rethinking the 4 P’s for today’s B2B reality. Although the original concept has served consumer marketers for six decades, the same no longer holds true in B2B. As the article states, “they often yield narrow, product-focused strategies that are increasingly at odds with the imperative to deliver solutions.” The authors did a five-year study with more than 500 managers across the globe and multiple industries. The findings revealed insights that can benefit B2B companies, their executive management, sales and marketing teams. Our own experience confirms they are on the right track with the following shift.
Instead of Product, Focus on Solutions
Although most good marketers know to focus on benefits and not features, the reality is that benefits don’t go far enough. The bottom line comes down to only one thing — solutions. Many B2B companies and especially those whose leaders come from a background in engineering or technology should realize these claims of technological superior products are not long-term differentiators, but mostly just an ante into the game. The reality is that they should build an internal culture focused on offering a customer-centric perspective instead.
Instead of Place, Focus on Access
Understanding and determining the right channels of distribution are critical for any B2B company. There are many complexities and options to consider and the rules have changed considerably over the last decade, especially with online purchasing. An integrated, cross-channel system can benefit the organization by offering customers access to a rich experience, open communication and the opportunity to buy in their preferred manner. One of these new added benefits is that companies can now develop a direct relationship with the end user in ways never before available.
Instead of Price, Focus on Value
Rather than emphasizing price compared to your competitors, the entire focus should be on the unique value of the product or service. This approach clearly relates back to focusing on solutions. People make decisions based on emotions, not rational facts. A strong value proposition with a compelling emotional component can paint a beautiful scenario of lasting value resulting in a smart buying decision.
Instead of Promotion, Focus on Education
People are influenced differently today. Although advertising and PR still have their place in the marketing tool kit, they are no longer as effective. It is far more beneficial to provide relevant information specific to the customer’s needs throughout their purchasing cycle. Becoming an industry “thought leader” is a very powerful position to achieve and this is only possible when you place the customer’s needs ahead of your desire to sell them something. It’s a big time commitment to continually educate the customer (and your industry), but the rewards are significant. It doesn’t happen overnight, but the concept builds a strong and collaborative internal culture as well.
In summary, I believe this new mindset is far more effective than the one developed half a century ago. This solution-based strategy will be far more relevant to your customers and result in sustainable growth for B2B companies. What do you think?
Different thought, Different time. Remember, the bitter taste of poor quality lasts far longer than the sweet taste of low price.
Learn more about the author of this post, Ryan Rieches.




Ryan, thanks for sharing. I have long believed that the 4P’s were dead – in fact, I recently consulted with a small technology firm who stated they needed no help with marketing strategy, because they had the “4 P’s” all worked out. It is absolutely necessary for b2b companies to consider what constitutes strategy in today’s context and vernacular.
Chris Marocchi on 01.29.13 at 4:00 pmMany B2B companies are engineering or technology driven, hey look at all this cool wiz bang stuff we can do ! but these folks don’t know any customers. The Solutions, Value, Access, Education approach takes a customer focused approach. As I often say I don’t care what I think, it is what the customer thinks and they have the only vote that counts, and they vote with their money…..
I have had the pleasure of working with Rieches-Baird they are an agency that truly gets B2B. Great observations about the changing world of B2B.
Phil Sallaway – Product Manager, California
Phil Sallaway on 01.30.13 at 5:36 pmThis article is like a string to our hearts. At Scaffold Research we spend our lives educating people about the importance of creating a Value Proposition so you know what to ask for – and get!That really touches on all the points you have made above. Thanks for the great article
Sally Ostick on 01.31.13 at 7:49 amGreat post Ryan. The only refinement I’d suggest is to put engagement in place of promotion instead of education.
Cheers
Grant Johnson on 01.31.13 at 11:59 amThanks, Ryan. Our Marketing group has been operating this way for a while. We’ve even expanded the Solutions approach to include offerings that may not even be ours. You can imagine the internal angst that’s creating. Good stuff.
Brian Fugere on 01.31.13 at 3:55 pmThis is excellent food for thought. I think many have already abandoned product sales for solutions (solution selling, benefits not features). I think value over price is right on with the emphasis on selling solutions. I think that Access over Place is appropriate in this age of online buyers in control / “I want what I want when I want it.” I think that education vs promotion depends on the product lifecycle stage – you need to educate people about a new product but you have to promote the heck out of a product in a growth market.
Jennifer Beever on 02.18.13 at 11:54 pmVery interesting! Many thanks for sharing.
Amparo Torres on 05.12.13 at 10:22 am